Attorney General's Office v. Information Commissioner's office and Male' Water and Sewerage Company Private Limitedއެޓަރނީ ޖެނެރަލްގެ އޮފީސް ވ. އިންފޮމޭޝަން ކޮމިޝަނަރުގެ އޮފީސް އަދި މާލޭ ވޯޓަރ އެންޑް ސްވަރޭޖް ކޮމްޕެނީ ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑް
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Prosecutor General’s Office, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Prosecutor General’s Office, alleging that the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Sharu Launch Services Pvt Authority alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court by the Prosecutor General's Office contesting that High Court’s decision to deny Prosecutor General’s Office’s request to intervene in High Court’s cases 2020/HC-A/298,299,300,301 contradicts with Article 223 of the Constitution.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court by Attorney General’s Office contesting that High Court’s decision related to Attorney General’s representation of local councils in courts is in contradiction with Decentralization of the Administrative Divisions of the Maldives Act (Act no. 7/2010)
Article 50(a) of the Maldivian Telecommunications Act - Conducting an investigation by obtaining the required consent from individuals whose mobile numbers are used in the investigation and providing the court with the relevant details, while ensuring proper verification of this informationދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ޓެލެކޮމިއުނިކޭޝަން ޤާނޫނުގެ 50 ވަނަ މާއްދާގެ (ހ) - ތަހްޤީޤުތަކުގައި ތުހުމަތު ކުރެވޭ މީހާ ބޭނުންކުރާ މޯބައިލް ނަމްބަރުތަކާއި ގުޅުންހުރި ތަފްސީލުތައް ކޯޓު އަމުރެއް ދަށުން ހޯދުމުގެ ކުރިން، އެ މަޢުލޫމާތުތަކުގެ ވެރިފަރާތުގެ ރުހުން ހޯދުން
This Case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by the appellant (Abdulla Nahid) stating that, the Judgment of High Court case number 2018/HC-A/47, was erroneous and contrary to the principles of Shariah and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by A.A.A & Trading company Pvt Ltd alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Fast Construction & Trading Company Pvt Ltd alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by H. Mango House, Ahmed Thaufeeq alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
Attorney General's Office v. Information Commissioner's office and Male' Water and Sewerage Company Private Limitedއެޓަރނީ ޖެނެރަލްގެ އޮފީސް ވ. އިންފޮމޭޝަން ކޮމިޝަނަރުގެ އޮފީސް އަދި މާލޭ ވޯޓަރ އެންޑް ސްވަރޭޖް ކޮމްޕެނީ ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑް
Law number 1/2014 [right to information Act, Section 31 of the Judicature Act [22/2010]
Article 17, 20 and 60 of the Constitution, discrimination, prohibition of double jeopardy, Fraud, section 29 of the High court regulation, expiration of duration to appeal, failure to provide case report, circumstances beyond power
