This case was submitted to the Supreme Court by Shaaneez International Pvt Ltd contesting that High Court’s judgement was adjudicated in contradiction to Shariah and Lawsޝާނީޒް އިންޓަނޭޝަނަލް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑުން އެ މައްސަލަ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހެޅީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުމަކީ ޝަރީއާ އާއި ގާނޫނާ ހިލާފު ނިންމުމެއް ކަމަށް ބުނެ އެވެ.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court by Sabah Ahmed and three other parties contesting that the High Court’s verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to the Constitution and laws.
This Case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by the appellant (Hussain Shareef) stating that, the Judgment of High Court case number 2016/HC-A/374, was erroneous and contrary to the principles of Shariah and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mahudhee Ageel alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Ahmed Didi, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and law
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުން ނިންމާފައިވަނީ އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފަށް ކަމަށް ބުނެ، ރިޖްވުޑް ހޮޓެލްސް އެންޑް ސުއިޓްސް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑުގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅައިފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Ridgewood Hotels and Suites Pvt Ltd، alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws
Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh and 3 Others v. State (Ministry of Islamic Affairs)މުޙައްމަދު އަސްލަމް އަދި އިސްމާޢީލް ސުވައިދު އިތުރު 3 ފަރާތެއް ވ. ދިވެހި ދައުލަތް (މިނިސްޓްރީ އޮފް އިސްލާމިކް އެފެއާޒް)
Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh and 3 Others v. State (Ministry of Islamic Affairs)މުޙައްމަދު އަސްލަމް އަދި އިސްމާޢީލް ސުވައިދު އިތުރު 3 ފަރާތެއް ވ. ދިވެހި ދައުލަތް (މިނިސްޓްރީ އޮފް އިސްލާމިކް އެފެއާޒް)
+3 more+3 އިތުރު
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh, Mariyam Rasheeda Ibrahim, Musthafa Mohamed Didi & Al-Fathuh Hajj & Umra Group Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
