This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Maldives Inland Revenue Authority (MIRA), alleging that the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.މޯލްޑިވްސް އިންލެންޑް ރެވެނިއު އޮތޯރިޓީ (މީރާ) އިން އެ މައްސަލަ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ގެންގޮސްފައި ވަނީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ހުކުމަކީ ޝަރީޢާ އާއި ގާނޫނާ ހިލާފު ހުކުމެއް ކަމަށް ބުނެ އެވެ.
ADK Enterprises Pvt Ltd brought this case to the Supreme Court asserting that the judgment of the High Court contravened the provisions of the Tax Administration Act (Law Number: 3/2010) and precedents established by previous decisions of the Supreme Court.އޭޑީކޭ އެންޓަޕްރައިސަސް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑުން އެ މައްސަލަ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހެޅީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުމަކީ ޓެކްސް ނެގުމާބެހޭ އިދާރީ ގާނޫނު (ގާނޫނު ނަންބަރު: 3/2010) އާއި ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓުގެ ކުރީގެ ހުކުމްތަކާ ހިލާފު ނިންމުމެއް ކަމަށެވެ.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by, Maldives Inland Revenue Authority (MIRA) & Noomadi Resorts Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court by the Prosecutor General's Office contesting that High Court’s decision to deny Prosecutor General’s Office’s request to intervene in High Court’s cases 2020/HC-A/298,299,300,301 contradicts with Article 223 of the Constitution.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Medianet Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ހުކުމް އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީއަތާއި ގާނޫނުތަކާ ހިލާފު ކަމަށް ބުނެ މީޑިއާނެޓް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑްގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހެޅި މައްސަލައެކެވެ.
