2021/SC-A/25·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Nasira Mohamed Didi, M. Kudanevige, Male, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.ކުޑަނެވިގެ، ނާސިރާ މުހައްމަދު ދީދީ ވަނީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ހުކުމަކީ ޝަރީޢާ އާއި ގާނޫނާ ހިލާފު ހުކުމެއް ކަމަށް ބުނެ އެ މައްސަލަ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ގެންގޮސްފަ އެވެ.
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2021/SC-A/21·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mahudhee Ageel alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2021/SC-A/11·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by H. Mango House, Ahmed Thaufeeq alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2021/SC-F/04·Review of a Supreme Court Judgment or Decisionސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓުގެ ޙުކުމް ނުވަތަ ނިންމުން އަލުން ބަލައިދިނުމަށް އެދި ހުށަހަޅާ މައްސަލަތައް
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court by Dr. Mohamed Zahir Hussain requesting to review Supreme Court’s decision.
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2021/SC-A/08·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2021/SC-A/12·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Prosecutor General’s Office’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ހުކުމް އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީއަތާއި ގާނޫނުތަކާ ހިލާފު ކަމަށް ބުނެ ޕްރޮސިކިއުޓަރ ޖެނެރަލްގެ އޮފީހުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހެޅި މައްސަލައެކެވެ.
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2020/SC-A/110·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2020/SC-A/108·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2020/SC-A/109·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2020/SC-A/101·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2020/SC-A/93·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2020/SC-A/105·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh, Mariyam Rasheeda Ibrahim, Musthafa Mohamed Didi & Al-Fathuh Hajj & Umra Group Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2020/SC-A/106·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh, Mariyam Rasheeda Ibrahim, Musthafa Mohamed Didi & Al-Fathuh Hajj & Umra Group Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2020/SC-A/104·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh, Mariyam Rasheeda Ibrahim, Musthafa Mohamed Didi & Al-Fathuh Hajj & Umra Group Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2020/SC-A/103·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh, Mariyam Rasheeda Ibrahim, Musthafa Mohamed Didi & Al-Fathuh Hajj & Umra Group Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2020/SC-A/102·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh, Mariyam Rasheeda Ibrahim, Musthafa Mohamed Didi & Al-Fathuh Hajj & Umra Group Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2020/SC-A/100·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2020/SC-A/111·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2020/SC-A/84·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
Criminal Law - Final verdict on hudud offences – Offences -Murder – Intention to commit the crime
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
5 justicesފަސް ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
2020/SC-A/68·Appellate Matterއިސްތިއުނާފީ މައްސަލަ
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesތިން ފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސްFiledހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
