Case Registryމައްސަލަތަކުގެ ރަޖިސްޓަރީ

Contract- Rent and associated expenses

ސ. މީދޫ، ދުވޭދާރުގެ، ޙަސަން ސަޢީދުގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހި ދައުލަތް (މޯލްޑިވްސް ޕޮލިސް ސަރވިސް) ގެ މައްޗަށް ހުށަހެޅިފައިވާ މައްސަލައެއް

ދަފްތަރު ނަންބަރު ރސ 2894، އިބްރާހީމް ތައުފީޤްގެ ފަރާތުން ގދ.ތިނަދޫ، ލަވްނެސްޓް، ޢަބްދުﷲ ލަޠީފްގެ މައްޗަށް ހުށަހެޅިފައިވާ މައްސަލައިގެ ޙުކުމް

އދ. މާމިގިލީ، ފިޔަނޫވިލާ، އާމިނަތު ޤާސިމްގެ ފަރާތުން އދ. މާމިގިލީ ކައުންސިލް އިދާރާގެ މައްޗަށް ދަޢުވާކުރާ މައްސަލައިގެ ޙުކުމް

This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Dheebaja Investment Pvt Ltd alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.

Constitutional, Article 94, Article143 (c) (d), Article 271, Article 274 (a) of the Constitution of the Republic of the Maldives, Delegation of power to make regulations and orders with lawful authority

Law number 1/2014 [right to information Act, Section 31 of the Judicature Act [22/2010]

Law number 1/2014 [right to information Act, Section 31 of the Judicature Act [22/2010]

This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Abdulla Yamin Abdul Gayyoom, Ma. Kaaminy Hulhanguge, Male’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.

ތ. ކަނޑޫދޫ، ބިގްފިޝް ޤާސިމް މޫސާގެ ފަރާތުން ސިވިލް ސަވިރސް ކޮމިޝަންގެ އޮފީހުގެ މައްޗަށް ހުށަހެޅިފައިވާ މައްސަލައެއް

Employment matter - Request to reinstate- damages

This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Nasira Mohamed Didi, M. Kudanevige, Male, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.ކުޑަނެވިގެ، ނާސިރާ މުހައްމަދު ދީދީ ވަނީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ހުކުމަކީ ޝަރީޢާ އާއި ގާނޫނާ ހިލާފު ހުކުމެއް ކަމަށް ބުނެ އެ މައްސަލަ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ގެންގޮސްފަ އެވެ.

This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mahudhee Ageel alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.

Delivery of goods, recovery of money, burden of proof.

This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by H. Mango House, Ahmed Thaufeeq alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.

މި މައްސަލައަކީ ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓުގެ ރެޖިސްޓްރާރުގެ ނިންމެވުން މުރާޖައާކޮށްދިނުމަށް އެދި، އަތަމާ އިންވެސްޓްމަންޓް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑްގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Athama Investment Private Limited، to review Supreme Court’s Registrar’s decision.

This case was submitted to the Supreme Court by Dr. Mohamed Zahir Hussain requesting to review Supreme Court’s decision.

އަހްމެޓް އައިޑެނިޒް މޯލްޑިވްސް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑްގެ ފަރާތުން ޖީ އެކްސް އެސޯސިއޭޓްސް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑްގެ މައްޗަށް ހުށަހެޅިފައިވާ މައްސަލައެއް

Court Order – Impounding of Passportކޯޓު އަމުރު – ޕާސްޕޯޓް ހިފެހެއްޓުން

This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Prosecutor General’s Office’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ހުކުމް އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީއަތާއި ގާނޫނުތަކާ ހިލާފު ކަމަށް ބުނެ ޕްރޮސިކިއުޓަރ ޖެނެރަލްގެ އޮފީހުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހެޅި މައްސަލައެކެވެ.