Attorney General's Office v. Information Commissioner's office and Male' Water and Sewerage Company Private Limitedއެޓަރނީ ޖެނެރަލްގެ އޮފީސް ވ. އިންފޮމޭޝަން ކޮމިޝަނަރުގެ އޮފީސް އަދި މާލޭ ވޯޓަރ އެންޑް ސްވަރޭޖް ކޮމްޕެނީ ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑް
Constitutional, Article 94, Article143 (c) (d), Article 271, Article 274 (a) of the Constitution of the Republic of the Maldives, Delegation of power to make regulations and orders with lawful authority
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Ahmed Mohamed and Mohamed Jamsheed alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This appeal was brought to the Supreme Court by the Prosecutor General's Office contesting that the High Court’s decision in 2022/HC-B12/33 is in contradiction to Act No. 12/2016, Act No. 4/2011 and Regulation No. 2021-SC-REG-01
This appeal was brought to the Supreme Court by the Prosecutor General's Office contesting that the High Court’s decision in 2022/HC-B12/26 is in contradiction to Act No. 12/2016, Act No. 4/2011 and Supreme Court’s Regulation No. 2021-SC-REG-01
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Coral Gate Maldives Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Prosecutor General’s Office, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court by the Prosecutor General's Office contesting that High Court’s decision to deny Prosecutor General’s Office’s request to intervene in High Court’s cases 2020/HC-A/298,299,300,301 contradicts with Article 223 of the Constitution.
Article 50(a) of the Maldivian Telecommunications Act - Conducting an investigation by obtaining the required consent from individuals whose mobile numbers are used in the investigation and providing the court with the relevant details, while ensuring proper verification of this informationދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ޓެލެކޮމިއުނިކޭޝަން ޤާނޫނުގެ 50 ވަނަ މާއްދާގެ (ހ) - ތަހްޤީޤުތަކުގައި ތުހުމަތު ކުރެވޭ މީހާ ބޭނުންކުރާ މޯބައިލް ނަމްބަރުތަކާއި ގުޅުންހުރި ތަފްސީލުތައް ކޯޓު އަމުރެއް ދަށުން ހޯދުމުގެ ކުރިން، އެ މަޢުލޫމާތުތަކުގެ ވެރިފަރާތުގެ ރުހުން ހޯދުން
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by A.A.A & Trading company Pvt Ltd alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Fast Construction & Trading Company Pvt Ltd alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by H. Mango House, Ahmed Thaufeeq alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
Attorney General's Office v. Information Commissioner's office and Male' Water and Sewerage Company Private Limitedއެޓަރނީ ޖެނެރަލްގެ އޮފީސް ވ. އިންފޮމޭޝަން ކޮމިޝަނަރުގެ އޮފީސް އަދި މާލޭ ވޯޓަރ އެންޑް ސްވަރޭޖް ކޮމްޕެނީ ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑް
Law number 1/2014 [right to information Act, Section 31 of the Judicature Act [22/2010]
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Abdulla Yamin Abdul Gayyoom, Ma. Kaaminy Hulhanguge, Male’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mahudhee Ageel alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
