This appeal was brought to the Supreme Court by the Prosecutor General's Office contesting that the High Court’s decision in 2022/HC-B12/26 is in contradiction to Act No. 12/2016, Act No. 4/2011 and Supreme Court’s Regulation No. 2021-SC-REG-01
This appeal was brought to the Supreme Court by the Prosecutor General's Office contesting that the High Court’s decision in 2022/HC-B12/33 is in contradiction to Act No. 12/2016, Act No. 4/2011 and Regulation No. 2021-SC-REG-01
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Prosecutor General’s Office, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Prosecutor General’s Office, alleging that the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
Article 50(a) of the Maldivian Telecommunications Act - Conducting an investigation by obtaining the required consent from individuals whose mobile numbers are used in the investigation and providing the court with the relevant details, while ensuring proper verification of this informationދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ޓެލެކޮމިއުނިކޭޝަން ޤާނޫނުގެ 50 ވަނަ މާއްދާގެ (ހ) - ތަހްޤީޤުތަކުގައި ތުހުމަތު ކުރެވޭ މީހާ ބޭނުންކުރާ މޯބައިލް ނަމްބަރުތަކާއި ގުޅުންހުރި ތަފްސީލުތައް ކޯޓު އަމުރެއް ދަށުން ހޯދުމުގެ ކުރިން، އެ މަޢުލޫމާތުތަކުގެ ވެރިފަރާތުގެ ރުހުން ހޯދުން
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Abdulla Yamin Abdul Gayyoom, Ma. Kaaminy Hulhanguge, Male’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުން ނިންމާފައިވަނީ އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފަށް ކަމަށް ބުނެ، ޕްރޮސިކިއުޓަރ ޖެނެރަލްގެ އޮފީހުގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Prosecutor General's Office alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުން ނިންމާފައިވަނީ އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފަށް ކަމަށް ބުނެ، މއ. ހިލްމަން، އިބްރާހީމް ޙުޝާންގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Ibrahim Hushan، G.Hilman، Male’، alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This Case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by the appellant (Abdullah Jaamiu) stating that, the Judgment of High Court case number 2016/HC-A/553, was erroneous and contrary to the principles of Shariah and laws.އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީއަތާއި ގާނޫނުތަކުގެ އަސްލުތަކާ ހިލާފު ކަމަށް ބުނެ އިސްތިއުނާފު ކުރާ ފަރާތް ކަމަށްވާ ޢަބްދުﷲ ޖާމިޢުގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހެޅި މައްސަލައެކެވެ
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Hamid Ismail alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ހުކުމް އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީއަތާއި ގާނޫނުތަކާ ހިލާފު ކަމަށް ބުނެ ހާމިދު އިސްމާއީލްގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހެޅި މައްސަލައެކެވެ.
