This Case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by the appellant (Araam Travel Private Limited) stating that, the Judgement of High Court case number 2016/HC-A/186, was erroneous and contrary to the principles of Shariah and laws.މި މައްސަލައަކީ، ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ހައިކޯޓުގެ 2016/HC-A/186 ނަންބަރު ޤަޟިއްޔާގެ ޙުކުމަކީ ޝަރީޢަތާ އަދި ޤާނޫނާ ޚިލާފަށް އަދި ގޯސްކޮށް ކޮށްފައިވާ ޙުކުމެއް ކަމަށް ބުނެ އަރާމް ޓްރެވަލް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑްގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ޙުށަހެޅި މައްސަލައެކެވެ.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Maumoon Hussain Fulhu alleging that the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.މިއީ، ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ހައިކޯޓުން ޙުކުމްކޮށްފައިވަނީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނާއި ޚިލާފަށް ކަމަށް ބުނެ މައުމޫން ޙުސައިންފުޅުގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Zulaikha Ahmed, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.އެ މައްސަލަ ޒުލައިޚާ އަހުމަދު ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހެޅުއްވީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުމަކީ ޝަރީޢާ އާއި ގާނޫނާ ހިލާފު ނިންމުމެއް ކަމަށް ބުނެ އެވެ.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Fathimath Hussain, H. Cozy House, Male, alleging that the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Dheebaja Investment Pvt Ltd alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
Constitutional, Article 94, Article143 (c) (d), Article 271, Article 274 (a) of the Constitution of the Republic of the Maldives, Delegation of power to make regulations and orders with lawful authority
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Fast Construction & Trading Company Pvt Ltd alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mahudhee Ageel alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުން އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފު ކަމަށް ބުނެ، ދައުލަތުގެ ފަރާތުން (މިނިސްޓްރީ އޮފް ޓޫރިޒަމް) ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by State (Ministry of Tourism) alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
މި ދެ މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުންތައް ނިންމާފައިވަނީ އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފަށް ކަމަށް ބުނެ، އާމިރު ޔޫސުފްގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލަތަކެކެވެ.These two cases were submitted by Amir Yoosuf، alleging that High Court judgments were adjudicated in contradiction to the Sharia and Laws
