2024/SC-E/01Election Matterއިންތިޚާބީ މައްސަލަ
Mohamed Iyaz v ECމުޙައްމަދު އިޔާޒް ވ. އިލެކްޝަންސް ކޮމިޝަން
Judgment givenޙުކުމް ކުރެވިފައި
3 justicesފަނޑިޔާރުންގެ މަޖިލިސް އަދަދު: 3Filedހުށަހެޅި · Decidedޙުކުމް
Loading…ލޯޑްކުރަނީ…
Search cases, access judgments, view hearing schedules, and explore court statistics.މައްސަލަ ހޯދާ، ހުކުމްތައް ވަދެވޭގޮތަށް، ޝަރީއަތް ތާވަލު ބައްލަވާ، އަދި ކޯޓުގެ ތަފާސްހިސާބު ބައްލަވާ.
ޢަބްދުﷲ ޔާމީން ޢަބްދުލްޤައްޔޫމްގެ ފަރާތުން އިލެކްޝަންސް ކޮމިޝަންގެ މައްޗަށް ރައްދުވާ ގޮތަށް ހުށަހެޅިފައިވާ މައްސަލައެއް
This case was submitted to the Supreme court of the Maldives by Ahmed Reehan alleging that the high court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.އަހުމަދު ރީހާން ވަނީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުމަކީ އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢާ އާއި ގާނޫނުތަކާ ހިލާފު ނިންމުންތަކެއް ކަމަށް ބުނެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް މައްސަލަ ބައްލަވައިފަ އެވެ.
This case was submitted to the Supreme court of the Maldives by Salfiyya Anwar alleging that the high court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.ސަލްފިއްޔާ އަންވަރު އެ މައްސަލަ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހެޅުއްވީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ހުކުމަކީ ޝަރީޢާ އާއި ގާނޫނާ ހިލާފު ނިންމުމެއް ކަމަށް ބުނެ އެވެ.
އެޓަރނީ ޖެނެރަލްގެ އޮފީސް (ދިވެހި ދައުލަތް)ގެ ފަރާތުން އޭޝިއާ ރިސޯޓްސް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑްގެ މައްޗަށް ހުށަހެޅިފައިވާ މައްސަލައެއް
These cases were submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
These cases were submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
These cases were submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This Case was submitted to the Supreme court of the Maldives by State Bank of India [Male' Branch] , alleging the High Court Decision was adjudicated in contradiction to laws.
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުން ނިންމާފައިވަނީ އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފަށް ކަމަށް ބުނެ، ޕްރޮސިކިއުޓަރ ޖެނެރަލްގެ އޮފީހުގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Prosecutor General's Office alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
އޭއައިއެސް އެލްއެލްޕީ ގެ ފަރާތުން މިނިސްޓްރީ އޮފް އިކޮނޮމިކް ޑިވެލޮޕްމަންޓް (ދައުލަތް) ގެ މައްޗަށް ހުށަހެޅި މައްސަލައެއް
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Maryam Nazaha alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.މަރްޔަމް ނަޒާހާ ވަނީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުމަކީ ޝަރީޢާ އާއި ގާނޫނާ ހިލާފު ނިންމުންތަކެއް ކަމަށް ބުނެ އެ މައްސަލަ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅުއްވާފަ އެވެ.
This Case was submitted to the Supreme court of the Maldives by NGOC HIEU SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Ocean Harvest (Maldives) Pvt Ltd alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Bank of Maldives PLC alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Maldives Inland Revenue Authority alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Maldives Inland Revenue Authority alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mahudhee Ageel alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court by Dr. Mohamed Zahir Hussain requesting to review Supreme Court’s decision.