Attorney General's Office v. Information Commissioner's office and Male' Water and Sewerage Company Private Limitedއެޓަރނީ ޖެނެރަލްގެ އޮފީސް ވ. އިންފޮމޭޝަން ކޮމިޝަނަރުގެ އޮފީސް އަދި މާލޭ ވޯޓަރ އެންޑް ސްވަރޭޖް ކޮމްޕެނީ ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑް
Attorney General's Office v. Information Commissioner's office and Male' Water and Sewerage Company Private Limitedއެޓަރނީ ޖެނެރަލްގެ އޮފީސް ވ. އިންފޮމޭޝަން ކޮމިޝަނަރުގެ އޮފީސް އަދި މާލޭ ވޯޓަރ އެންޑް ސްވަރޭޖް ކޮމްޕެނީ ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑް
Law number 1/2014 [right to information Act, Section 31 of the Judicature Act [22/2010]
Article 17, 20 and 60 of the Constitution, discrimination, prohibition of double jeopardy, Fraud, section 29 of the High court regulation, expiration of duration to appeal, failure to provide case report, circumstances beyond power
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Abdulla Yamin Abdul Gayyoom, Ma. Kaaminy Hulhanguge, Male’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mahudhee Ageel alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Ahmed Didi, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and law
This Case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by the appellant (Hub Company Pvt Ltd) stating that, the Judgement of High Court case number 2015/HC-A/340, was erroneous and contrary to the principles of Shariah and laws.
Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh and 3 Others v. State (Ministry of Islamic Affairs)މުޙައްމަދު އަސްލަމް އަދި އިސްމާޢީލް ސުވައިދު އިތުރު 3 ފަރާތެއް ވ. ދިވެހި ދައުލަތް (މިނިސްޓްރީ އޮފް އިސްލާމިކް އެފެއާޒް)
+3 more+3 އިތުރު
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh, Mariyam Rasheeda Ibrahim, Musthafa Mohamed Didi & Al-Fathuh Hajj & Umra Group Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުން ނިންމާފައިވަނީ އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފަށް ކަމަށް ބުނެ، މޯލްޑިވްސް ޕޯޓްސް ލިމިޓެޑް (އެމް.ޕީ.އެލް) ގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Maldives Ports Limited alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުން ނިންމާފައިވަނީ އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފަށް ކަމަށް ބުނެ، ސެންޓަރ އެންޓަރޕްރައިޒަސް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑްގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Center Enterprises Pvt Ltd، alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުން އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފު ކަމަށް ބުނެ، ދައުލަތުގެ ފަރާތުން (މިނިސްޓްރީ އޮފް ޓޫރިޒަމް) ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by State (Ministry of Tourism) alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
Center Enterprises Pvt Ltd v. Maldives Ports Limitedސެންޓަރ އެންޓަރޕްރައިސަސް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑް ވ. މޯލްޑިވްސް ޕޯޓްސް ލިމިޓެޑް
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުން އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފު ކަމަށް ބުނެ، ސެންޓަރ އެންޓަރޕްރައިޒަސް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑްގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Center Enterprises Pvt Ltd، alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ހުކުމް އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފު ކަމަށް ބުނެ، ހުސައިން ރަޝީދުގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This Case was submitted to the Supreme court of the Maldives by Hussain Rasheed، alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
