This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Ahmed Mohamed and Mohamed Jamsheed alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This appeal was brought to the Supreme Court by the Prosecutor General's Office contesting that the High Court’s decision in 2022/HC-B12/33 is in contradiction to Act No. 12/2016, Act No. 4/2011 and Regulation No. 2021-SC-REG-01
This appeal was brought to the Supreme Court by the Prosecutor General's Office contesting that the High Court’s decision in 2022/HC-B12/26 is in contradiction to Act No. 12/2016, Act No. 4/2011 and Supreme Court’s Regulation No. 2021-SC-REG-01
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Maldives Inland Revenue Authority alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Maldives Inland Revenue Authority alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Coral Gate Maldives Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Prosecutor General’s Office, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Prosecutor General’s Office, alleging that the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Sharu Launch Services Pvt Authority alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court by the Prosecutor General's Office contesting that High Court’s decision to deny Prosecutor General’s Office’s request to intervene in High Court’s cases 2020/HC-A/298,299,300,301 contradicts with Article 223 of the Constitution.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court by Attorney General’s Office contesting that High Court’s decision related to Attorney General’s representation of local councils in courts is in contradiction with Decentralization of the Administrative Divisions of the Maldives Act (Act no. 7/2010)
Article 50(a) of the Maldivian Telecommunications Act - Conducting an investigation by obtaining the required consent from individuals whose mobile numbers are used in the investigation and providing the court with the relevant details, while ensuring proper verification of this informationދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ޓެލެކޮމިއުނިކޭޝަން ޤާނޫނުގެ 50 ވަނަ މާއްދާގެ (ހ) - ތަހްޤީޤުތަކުގައި ތުހުމަތު ކުރެވޭ މީހާ ބޭނުންކުރާ މޯބައިލް ނަމްބަރުތަކާއި ގުޅުންހުރި ތަފްސީލުތައް ކޯޓު އަމުރެއް ދަށުން ހޯދުމުގެ ކުރިން، އެ މަޢުލޫމާތުތަކުގެ ވެރިފަރާތުގެ ރުހުން ހޯދުން
This Case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by the appellant (Abdulla Nahid) stating that, the Judgment of High Court case number 2018/HC-A/47, was erroneous and contrary to the principles of Shariah and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by A.A.A & Trading company Pvt Ltd alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Fast Construction & Trading Company Pvt Ltd alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by H. Mango House, Ahmed Thaufeeq alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
