This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh, Mariyam Rasheeda Ibrahim, Musthafa Mohamed Didi & Al-Fathuh Hajj & Umra Group Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh, Mariyam Rasheeda Ibrahim, Musthafa Mohamed Didi & Al-Fathuh Hajj & Umra Group Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh, Mariyam Rasheeda Ibrahim, Musthafa Mohamed Didi & Al-Fathuh Hajj & Umra Group Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh, Mariyam Rasheeda Ibrahim, Musthafa Mohamed Didi & Al-Fathuh Hajj & Umra Group Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Aslam, Ismail Suwaidh, Mariyam Rasheeda Ibrahim, Musthafa Mohamed Didi & Al-Fathuh Hajj & Umra Group Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓުން ނިންމާފައިވާ ނިންމުމެއް މުރާޖަޢާކޮށްދިނުމަށް އެދި، ޢަބްދުﷲ ޢަލީގެ ފަރާތުން ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Abdullah Ali requesting to review Supreme Court's decision.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Fathimath Hussain, H. Cozy House, Male, alleging that the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
Article 17, 20 and 60 of the Constitution, discrimination, prohibition of double jeopardy, Fraud, section 29 of the High court regulation, expiration of duration to appeal, failure to provide case report, circumstances beyond power
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުން ނިންމާފައިވަނީ އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފަށް ކަމަށް ބުނެ، ސަން ޓްރެވަލްސް އެންޑް ޓުއާޒް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑްގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Sun Travels and Tours Pvt Ltd alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This Case was submitted to the Supreme court of the Maldives by Ministry of Education, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ހުކުމް އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީއަތާއި ގާނޫނުތަކާ ހިލާފު ކަމަށް ބުނެ މިނިސްޓްރީ އޮފް އެޑިއުކޭޝަނުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހެޅި މައްސަލައެކެވެ.
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުން ނިންމާފައިވަނީ އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފަށް ކަމަށް ބުނެ، އެސްޓޭޓް އިންޓަރނޭޝަނަލް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑްގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This Case was submitted to the Supreme court of the Maldives by Estate International Private Limited، alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Sharu Launch Services Pvt Authority alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Mohamed Waheed alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
