This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by, Maldives Inland Revenue Authority (MIRA) & Noomadi Resorts Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by, Maldives Inland Revenue Authority (MIRA) & Noomadi Resorts Pvt Ltd’, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Fast Construction & Trading Company Pvt Ltd alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This Case was submitted to the Supreme court of the Maldives by Prosecutor General’s Office, alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ހުކުމް އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީއަތާއި ގާނޫނުތަކާ ހިލާފު ކަމަށް ބުނެ ޕްރޮސިކިއުޓަރ ޖެނެރަލްގެ އޮފީހުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހެޅި މައްސަލައެކެވެ.
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުން ނިންމާފައިވަނީ އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފަށް ކަމަށް ބުނެ، އަމާނާ ތަކަފުލް ޕީއެލްސީގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Amana Takaful Plc، alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުން ނިންމާފައިވަނީ އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފަށް ކަމަށް ބުނެ، މއ. ހިލްމަން، އިބްރާހީމް ޙުޝާންގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Ibrahim Hushan، G.Hilman، Male’، alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ނިންމުން އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފު ކަމަށް ބުނެ، ދައުލަތުގެ ފަރާތުން (މިނިސްޓްރީ އޮފް ޓޫރިޒަމް) ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by State (Ministry of Tourism) alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.
This Case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by the appellant (Araam Travel Private Limited) stating that, the Judgement of High Court case number 2016/HC-A/186, was erroneous and contrary to the principles of Shariah and laws.މި މައްސަލައަކީ، ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ހައިކޯޓުގެ 2016/HC-A/186 ނަންބަރު ޤަޟިއްޔާގެ ޙުކުމަކީ ޝަރީޢަތާ އަދި ޤާނޫނާ ޚިލާފަށް އަދި ގޯސްކޮށް ކޮށްފައިވާ ޙުކުމެއް ކަމަށް ބުނެ އަރާމް ޓްރެވަލް ޕްރައިވެޓް ލިމިޓެޑްގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ޙުށަހެޅި މައްސަލައެކެވެ.
މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ހުކުމް އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީޢަތާއި ޤާނޫނުތަކާ ޚިލާފު ކަމަށް ބުނެ، ހުސައިން ރަޝީދުގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހަޅާފައިވާ މައްސަލައެކެވެ.This Case was submitted to the Supreme court of the Maldives by Hussain Rasheed، alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by Hassan Ali Manik alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and Laws.މި މައްސަލައަކީ ހައިކޯޓުގެ ހުކުމް އިސްލާމީ ޝަރީއަތާއި ގާނޫނުތަކާ ހިލާފު ކަމަށް ބުނެ ހަސަން އަލީ މަނިކުގެ ފަރާތުން ދިވެހިރާއްޖޭގެ ސުޕްރީމް ކޯޓަށް ހުށަހެޅި މައްސަލައެކެވެ.
This case was submitted to the Supreme Court of the Maldives by A.A.A & Trading company Pvt Ltd alleging the High Court verdict was adjudicated in contradiction to Sharia and laws.
